The Bane of Video Uploader Identified
This is to all Users who upload videos and other material to XHamster.
The individual and his organization are as follows:
Nate Glass, CEO, he heads a group titled "Take Down Piracy". This outfit has carte blanche from all of the major Porn producing studios to represent their copyrights for their products.
If you've received DMCA issue notices from XH or any other sites you post to, now you know who to blame. You can find Mr. Glass widely getting notice via article all over Google and other sources. He and his organization are the source of all uploading Users woes having increased so greatly in the past year.
I doubt there's anything we can do to avoid contact with Mr. Glass and his group. I can only wish you all the luck in the World, and least you'll now know the source of your vexations.
NOTICE:
I have now been informed that Mr. Glass has now placed a Screen Capture of this page to his Twitter feed! Talk about an arrogant weasel hiding behind a veneer of self-righteousness!
The individual and his organization are as follows:
Nate Glass, CEO, he heads a group titled "Take Down Piracy". This outfit has carte blanche from all of the major Porn producing studios to represent their copyrights for their products.
If you've received DMCA issue notices from XH or any other sites you post to, now you know who to blame. You can find Mr. Glass widely getting notice via article all over Google and other sources. He and his organization are the source of all uploading Users woes having increased so greatly in the past year.
I doubt there's anything we can do to avoid contact with Mr. Glass and his group. I can only wish you all the luck in the World, and least you'll now know the source of your vexations.
NOTICE:
I have now been informed that Mr. Glass has now placed a Screen Capture of this page to his Twitter feed! Talk about an arrogant weasel hiding behind a veneer of self-righteousness!
8 år sedan
"xHamster has no rights to call us criminals, because we are not making a business of our uploads, the law about the copyright infringement is applied just if you make money selling the copies of an artwork, this is not our case so xhamster has no rights to send the warnings or at least he has to change the sentence, a lot."
XHamster is concerned just because is selling the videos, in this case the DMCA may act.
"I mean :
if the video was erased withour the warning, I was calm and I don't care but now I have a warning about something I never did and about an organization of judges that doesn't know they are mentioned on this site.
If I send a forbidden photo, doesn't matter if the subject is 21 years old now, judges check the age of the subject when the photo was made.
So, I never did a copyright infringement, as the site where I found the video never did a copyright infringement.
xHamster has to think better before to write something on his site, because the most of the times, the bad people is not here but on the side of the complaints, because the complaints are not sent by the real copyright owners and it means DMCA is not involved in this situation.
In this case is clear the producer company is expired so the DMCA will never accept the copyright infringement.
If the complaint was sent by the actress, Lorelei Lee, xHamster has to erase thousands of videos and photos.
Support is just cheating us and the DMCA, it's dangerous!
We never do anything but other members called lawyers for smaller situations, so imagine what they will do if xham call them criminals,
without evidences and with a lot of evidences against xHamster."
Akira Lane, forbidden on the most important adult tubesites and forums in a video of Jim Weathers, owner of the Bondage Cafe site and able to erase all the copies of his videos even in the ex U.S.S.R.
http://sv.xhamstervideo.net/movies/5365615/akira11.html
nobody is using DMCA on this site, they are just erasing what they need to repost or sell, since a loooooooong time!
I had another idea about the behaviour of several adult tubesites.
Because there were strange situations, some videos are erased in a fast way and you can assume the DMCA as a role about
these deletions, because the sites have a list of forbidden producers and/or actors, cause often they are world wide sponsors
of the adult tubesites([email protected],etc.).
Anyway other videos are deleted after a very long time, sometime years.
So i was looking for an answer about this situation and I imagined the sites have a role as "copyright hunters" but in a very strange way.
Porn is a too big world with a lot of little producers, you can say the most of them are just fools, because they have not ideas about the market, the general and common market.
So even if they make good products they have no idea about how they can sell their products, so they fail.
Tubesites have members and some of them are producers, actors and...resellers.
Why I'm talking of resellers?
Because all the tubesites are resellers, xHmaster included.
If your a VIP member you can see or buy some "special" videos.
So when a video is interesting, especially if it's strange, the "copyright hunters" begin to work.
The question is :
Is this video copyrighted?
Why the video is here since a long time and nobody is sending a complain(t)?
So if the video was made by a failed producer, the resellers acquire the copyrights or at least the permission to resell the video.
The last month I had a warning on my uploads page, so I checked my last videos but no one of them was deleted.
I was surprised and with a lot of questions in my mind, then I discovered the reason of the complain(t).
An old video was erased, I swear, I uploaded it just for fun and because I like Lorelei Lee, the videos was strange but it had several followers, so I tried to discover who was the producer and I found this page
http://www.pichunter.com/gallery/2876181/Lorelie_Lee_Is_An_Instense
below the photo you can see a banner to visit the page of the producer and the banner open this page
http://ww1.extremeballbusters.com/
site expired, probably the producer is expired.
So, who sent the complain(t)?
Surely not the DMCA.
Simple, is xHamster, because he(and some of his members) needs to acquire the copyrights to resell a strange video with a very famous actress protected by very important porn producers :
Br@zzers and Kink.
If the real producer of the video is "expired", surely somewhere is possible to buy the rights, to become the new owner of all the
videos of the "dead" producer .
DMCA concerns about the 20% of the deletion, the others are just the work of the tubesites owners :
sell, sell, sell especially because the cam are not a good business (xHamster is planning to move the cams elsewhere), meanwhile
the resellers are becoming a lot, all around the world.
Have fun and forgive my bad grammar.
May the fleas from a thousand camels infest his pubic area